Let x0 of type ο be given.

Assume H0: ∀ x1 : ι → ι → ι . (∃ x2 x3 : ι → ι → ι . ∃ x4 : ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι . MetaCat_coproduct_constr_p PER BinRelnHom struct_id struct_comp x1 x2 x3 x4) ⟶ x0.

Apply H0 with 3fa3a...

Let x1 of type ο be given.

Assume H1: ∀ x2 : ι → ι → ι . (∃ x3 : ι → ι → ι . ∃ x4 : ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι . MetaCat_coproduct_constr_p PER BinRelnHom struct_id struct_comp 3fa3a.. x2 x3 x4) ⟶ x1.

Apply H1 with λ x2 x3 . lam (ap x2 0) (λ x4 . Inj0 x4).

Let x2 of type ο be given.

Assume H2: ∀ x3 : ι → ι → ι . (∃ x4 : ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι . MetaCat_coproduct_constr_p PER BinRelnHom struct_id struct_comp 3fa3a.. (λ x5 x6 . lam (ap x5 0) (λ x7 . Inj0 x7)) x3 x4) ⟶ x2.

Apply H2 with λ x3 x4 . lam (ap x4 0) (λ x5 . Inj1 x5).

Let x3 of type ο be given.

Assume H3: ∀ x4 : ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι . MetaCat_coproduct_constr_p PER BinRelnHom struct_id struct_comp 3fa3a.. (λ x5 x6 . lam (ap x5 0) (λ x7 . Inj0 x7)) (λ x5 x6 . lam (ap x6 0) (λ x7 . Inj1 x7)) x4 ⟶ x3.

Apply H3 with λ x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 . lam (setsum (ap x4 0) (ap x5 0)) (λ x9 . combine_funcs (ap x4 0) (ap x5 0) (λ x10 . ap x7 x10) (λ x10 . ap x8 x10) x9).

Apply unknownprop_8014f2189a8e9a90722a83ab5f5b4d52ecd6d5c686aac8aa2eb5343a4f9f7780 with PER leaving 2 subgoals.

Let x4 of type ι be given.

Assume H4: PER x4.

Apply H4 with struct_r x4.

Assume H5: struct_r x4.

Assume H6: unpack_r_o x4 (λ x5 . λ x6 : ι → ι → ο . and (∀ x7 . x7 ∈ x5 ⟶ ∀ x8 . x8 ∈ x5 ⟶ x6 x7 x8 ⟶ x6 x8 x7) (∀ x7 . x7 ∈ x5 ⟶ ∀ x8 . x8 ∈ x5 ⟶ ∀ x9 . x9 ∈ x5 ⟶ x6 x7 x8 ⟶ x6 x8 x9 ⟶ x6 x7 x9)).

The subproof is completed by applying H5.

Let x4 of type ι be given.

Let x5 of type ι be given.

Assume H4: PER x4.

Assume H5: PER x5.

Apply unknownprop_c1d3826129d2eb54a8f1e40a6116497a0cdb00a6ee455a0b01d56d09477d50d0 with x4, λ x6 . PER (3fa3a.. x6 x5) leaving 2 subgoals.

The subproof is completed by applying H4.

Let x6 of type ι be given.

Let x7 of type ι → ι → ο be given.

Assume H6: ∀ x8 . x8 ∈ x6 ⟶ ∀ x9 . x9 ∈ x6 ⟶ x7 x8 x9 ⟶ x7 x9 x8.

Assume H7: ∀ x8 . x8 ∈ x6 ⟶ ∀ x9 . x9 ∈ x6 ⟶ ∀ x10 . x10 ∈ x6 ⟶ x7 x8 x9 ⟶ x7 x9 x10 ⟶ x7 x8 x10.

Apply unknownprop_c1d3826129d2eb54a8f1e40a6116497a0cdb00a6ee455a0b01d56d09477d50d0 with x5, λ x8 . PER (3fa3a.. (pack_r x6 x7) x8) leaving 2 subgoals.

The subproof is completed by applying H5.

Let x8 of type ι be given.

Let x9 of type ι → ι → ο be given.

Assume H8: ∀ x10 . x10 ∈ x8 ⟶ ∀ x11 . x11 ∈ x8 ⟶ x9 x10 x11 ⟶ x9 x11 x10.

Assume H9: ∀ x10 . ... ⟶ ∀ x11 . x11 ∈ ... ⟶ ∀ x12 . x12 ∈ x8 ⟶ x9 x10 x11 ⟶ x9 x11 x12 ⟶ x9 x10 x12.

...

■

Proofgold Proof