Let x0 of type ι be given.

Let x1 of type ι → ι → ι be given.

Assume H0: ∀ x2 . prim1 x2 x0 ⟶ ∀ x3 . prim1 x3 x0 ⟶ prim1 (x1 x2 x3) x0.

Let x2 of type ι → ι → ι be given.

Assume H1: ∀ x3 . prim1 x3 x0 ⟶ ∀ x4 . prim1 x4 x0 ⟶ prim1 (x2 x3 x4) x0.

Let x3 of type ι → ο be given.

Assume H2: ∀ x4 . ∀ x5 : ι → ι → ι . (∀ x6 . prim1 x6 x4 ⟶ ∀ x7 . prim1 x7 x4 ⟶ prim1 (x5 x6 x7) x4) ⟶ ∀ x6 : ι → ι → ι . (∀ x7 . prim1 x7 x4 ⟶ ∀ x8 . prim1 x8 x4 ⟶ prim1 (x6 x7 x8) x4) ⟶ x3 (b6bd3.. x4 x5 x6).

Apply H2 with x0, x1, x2 leaving 2 subgoals.

The subproof is completed by applying H0.

The subproof is completed by applying H1.

■

Proofgold Proof