Search for blocks/addresses/...

Proofgold Proof

pf
Let x0 of type ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι be given.
Let x1 of type ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι be given.
Assume H0: Church17_p x0.
Assume H1: Church17_p x1.
Apply H0 with λ x2 : ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι . or (TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 x2 x1 = λ x3 x4 . x3) (TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 x2 x1 = λ x3 x4 . x4) leaving 17 subgoals.
Apply H1 with λ x2 : ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι → ι . or (TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 . x3) x2 = λ x3 x4 . x3) (TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 . x3) x2 = λ x3 x4 . x4) leaving 17 subgoals.
Apply orIR with TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) = λ x2 x3 . x2, TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) = λ x2 x3 . x3.
Let x2 of type (ι → ι → ι) → (ι → ι → ι) → ο be given.
Assume H2: x2 (TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 . x3) (λ x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 . x3)) (λ x3 x4 . x4).
The subproof is completed by applying H2.
Apply orIL with TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x3) = λ x2 x3 . x2, TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x3) = λ x2 x3 . x3.
Let x2 of type (ι → ι → ι) → (ι → ι → ι) → ο be given.
Assume H2: x2 (TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 . x3) (λ x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 . x4)) (λ x3 x4 . x3).
The subproof is completed by applying H2.
Apply orIL with TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x4) = λ x2 x3 . x2, TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x4) = λ x2 x3 . x3.
Let x2 of type (ι → ι → ι) → (ι → ι → ι) → ο be given.
Assume H2: x2 (TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 . x3) (λ x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 . x5)) (λ x3 x4 . x3).
The subproof is completed by applying H2.
Apply orIR with TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x5) = λ x2 x3 . x2, TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x5) = λ x2 x3 . x3.
Let x2 of type (ι → ι → ι) → (ι → ι → ι) → ο be given.
Assume H2: x2 (TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 . x3) (λ x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 . x6)) (λ x3 x4 . x4).
The subproof is completed by applying H2.
Apply orIL with TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x6) = λ x2 x3 . x2, TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x6) = λ x2 x3 . x3.
Let x2 of type (ι → ι → ι) → (ι → ι → ι) → ο be given.
Assume H2: x2 (TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 . x3) (λ x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 . x7)) (λ x3 x4 . x3).
The subproof is completed by applying H2.
Apply orIR with TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x7) = λ x2 x3 . x2, TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x7) = λ x2 x3 . x3.
Let x2 of type (ι → ι → ι) → (ι → ι → ι) → ο be given.
Assume H2: x2 (TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 . x3) (λ x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 . x8)) (λ x3 x4 . x4).
The subproof is completed by applying H2.
Apply orIR with TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x8) = λ x2 x3 . x2, TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x8) = λ x2 x3 . x3.
Let x2 of type (ι → ι → ι) → (ι → ι → ι) → ο be given.
Assume H2: x2 (TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 . x3) (λ x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 . x9)) (λ x3 x4 . x4).
The subproof is completed by applying H2.
Apply orIR with TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x9) = λ x2 x3 . x2, TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x9) = λ x2 x3 . x3.
Let x2 of type (ι → ι → ι) → (ι → ι → ι) → ο be given.
Assume H2: x2 (TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 . x3) (λ x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 x19 . x10)) (λ x3 x4 . x4).
The subproof is completed by applying H2.
Apply orIL with TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x10) = λ x2 x3 . x2, TwoRamseyGraph_4_4_Church17 (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x2) (λ x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 x11 x12 x13 x14 x15 x16 x17 x18 . x10) = λ x2 x3 . x3.
Let x2 of type (ι → ι → ι) → (ι → ι → ι) → ο be given.
Assume H2: x2 ... ....
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
■